An Empty Product of Nonempty Sets

04 Jun 2025 - Tags: topos-theory

A few days ago I saw a cute question on mse asking about a particularly non-intuitive failing of the axiom of choice. I remember when I was an undergrad talking to a friend of mine about various statements equivalent to choice, and being particularly hung up on the same statement that OP asks about – The product of nonempty sets is nonempty. I understood that there were models where the axiom of choice fails, and so in those models we must have some family of nonempty sets whose product is, somehow, empty! Now that I’m older and I’ve spent much more time thinking about these things, this is less surprising to me, but reading that question reminded me how badly I once wanted a concrete example, and so I’ll share one here!

This should be a pretty quick post, since I’ll basically just be fleshing out my answer to that mse question. But I think it’ll also be nice to have here, since these things can be hard to find when you’re first getting into logic and topos theory! Let’s get to it!

First, let’s remember that for any group $G$ the category $G - Set$ of sets equipped with a $G$ -action is a topos. Indeed you can see it as a presheaf topos, since $G - Set$ is equivalent to the category of functors from $G \to Set$ (viewing $G$ as a one-object category). We’ve talked about this topos before, and it’s wild to think how far I’ve come since writing that post!

The basic idea of $G - Set$ as a topos is that any set theoretic construction we do to some $G$ -sets again gives us $G$ -sets! For instance, any (co)limits of $G$ -sets will have a natural $G$ -action. If $X$ is a $G$ -set then its powerset $P (X)$ has a $G$ -action where if $A \in P (X)$ we define $g \cdot A = {g \cdot a ∣ a \in A}$ , which is another element of $P (X)$ . If $X$ and $Y$ are $G$ -sets then the set of functions $X \to Y$ is again a $G$ -set where we say $(g \cdot_{X \to Y} f) (x) = g \cdot_{Y} f (g^{- 1} \cdot_{X} x)$ .

In particular, we can recover the “ $G$ -equivariant” constructions as the global elements! So even though $P (X)$ contains all subsets of $X$ (not just the $G$ -invariant subsets), if we look at the global elements (that is the maps $1 \to P (X)$ ) we do get exactly the $G$ -invariant subsets. Similarly while the set of functions $X \to Y$ sees all functions, the global elements of this set will pick out exactly the $G$ -equivariant functions.

But $G - Set$ has a coreflective subcategory given by those $G$ -sets all of whose orbits are finite. The coreflector takes a $G$ -set and just deletes all the infinite orbits, so we have an adjunction

(ι : G - {Set}_{finite orbits} \to G - Set) ⊣ (R : G - Set \to G - {Set}_{finite orbits})

which gives us a comonad $ι R$ on $G - Set$ . This comonad is idempotent, and its category of coalgebras is equivalent to $G - {Set}_{finite orbits}$ . Then since $ι$ is left exact (and so is $R$ , since it’s a right adjoint), we see that $G - {Set}_{finite orbits}$ is the category of coalgebras for a lex comonad on a topos, thus is itself a topos!

As a cute exercise, check that $ι$ really is left exact!

Now doing computations in this topos is pretty easy! Finite limits and arbitrary colimits are computed as in $G - Set$ since $ι$ preserves these. Arbitrary limits and exponentials $Y^{X}$ come from coreflecting – that is $Y^{X}$ as computed in $G - {Set}_{finite orbits}$ is just what we get by removing the infinite orbits from $Y^{X}$ as computed in $G - Set$ , and similarly for limits. The subobject classifier is just the usual set of truth values ${⊤, ⊥}$ with the trivial $G$ -action¹. In particular this topos is boolean, so set theory inside it is particularly close to the usual ZF set theory.

Now with this in mind, we can prove the main claim of this post:

In $Z - {Set}_{finite orbits}$ , let $C_{n}$ be $Z / n$ with its obvious $Z$ -action. Then each $C_{n}$ is inhabited² in the sense that $\exists x . x \in C_{n}$ , and yet $\prod_{n} C_{n} = \emptyset$ !

So this topos shows explicitly how, in the absence of choice, you can have a family of nonempty sets³ whose product is somehow empty!

The computation is actually quite friendly! To compute $\prod_{n} C_{n}$ in this topos, we first compute the product in the category of all $Z$ -sets, then throw away any infinite orbits.

But it’s easy to see that every orbit is infinite! Any element of the product will contain an element from every $C_{n}$ , so that in any finite number of steps some large entry in this tuple won’t be back where it started.

Ok, this one was actually quite quick, which I’m happy about! My parents are visiting soon, and I’m excited to take a few days to see them ^_^. I have another shorter post planned which another grad student asked me to write, and I’ve finally actually started the process of turning my posts on the topological topos into a paper. I’m starting to understand TQFTs better, and it’s been exciting to learn a bit more physics. Hopefully I’ll find time to talk about all that soon too, once I take some time to really organize my thoughts about it.

Thanks for hanging out, all! Stay safe, and we’ll talk soon.

In case $G = Z$ then it’s a kind of cute fact that this topos is equivalent to the topos of continuous (discrete) $\hat{Z}$ -sets, where $\hat{Z}$ is the profinite completion of $Z$ . See, for instance, Example A2.1.7 on page 72 of the elephant. This gives another computationally effective way to work with this topos!

I’m pretty sure I convinced myself that more generally the category of $G$ -sets all of whose orbits are finite should be equivalent to the category of continuous discrete $\hat{G}$ -sets, but I haven’t thought hard enough about it to say for sure in a blog post. ↩
Of course, there’s no global points for $n \neq 1$ , since maps $1 \to C_{n}$ correspond to fixed points. But existential quantification is local, so that the topos models $\exists x \in C_{n} . ⊤$ if there’s some surjection $V ↠ 1$ and a map $V \to C_{n}$ . ~~We can take $V = Z$ with its left multiplication action on itself, and there is a map from $Z \to C_{n}$ .~~ Edit, June 5: Thanks to Kevin Carlson for pointing out that $Z$ with its left multiplication action isn’t in this topos, since its orbit is infinite! We instead need, for each $n$ , to look at the surjection from $C_{n} ↠ 1$ and then you can use the identity map from $C_{n} \to C_{n}$ to witness inhabited-ness.

If you’re more used to type theory, we don’t have $Σ_{x : C_{n}} ⊤$ , since that would imply a global element. But despite this, we do have the propositional truncation $‖ Σ_{x : C_{n}} ⊤ ‖$ , so that an element of $C_{n}$ merely exists. ↩
Since this topos is boolean, nonempty and inhabited are actually synonyms here. Moreover, this “nonempty” is closer to how a lot of working mathematicians speak, so it felt right to use this wording here. ↩